| |
|
|
Will a New President Improve your Health or Make it Worse?
| By Diana Zuckerman, PhD |
February 2008 |
In less than a year, we will have a new president. How will
our new president affect your health and the health of your family
and friends?
The Democratic and Republican candidates all support big improvements
in health care to keep costs down and help more people have better
health care. They all agree that healthcare and health insurance
cost too much and that changes are needed. This is not a liberal
or conservative issue: even the most conservative candidate, Mike
Huckabee, calls for a "complete overhaul."
We have created a chart describing what each candidate supports
and doesn't support, based on information on each of their web
sites. There are some similarities: For example, Hillary Clinton and Barack
Obama both support expanding the health insurance program
that is currently available to Members of Congress and other federal
workers, to make it available to everyone. This is not a government
health care program -- it just makes the choice of Blue Cross/Blue
Shield, Kaiser Permanente, Aetna, and many other private health
insurance policies much more affordable. Both these candidates
would offer this as an option to all Americans, to reduce the
costs of health insurance. The main difference is that Obama would
require every child under 18 to have health insurance and Clinton
would also require every adult to have health insurance.
Mike Huckabee, John McCain, and Mitt Romney all oppose the idea
that the health insurance policies available to Congress and federal
workers should be expanded to make them available to all adults
and children. All 3 candidates believe that insurance companies
and private companies that buy health insurance for their employees
should be responsible for better health care, or the state governments,
but not the federal government. All believe that innovative changes
will reduce costs, although McCain also supports changes in federal
policies that will help make that happen.
The devil is in the details. For example, all the candidates want
health insurance to be more affordable, but they don't define
affordable.
Should all adults be required to have health insurance? Should
you care that millions of Americans don't have health insurance?
You might be suprised to learn that you help pay for expensive
health care for people who are uninsured, because the costs of
their care are shared by others using the same doctors or hospitals.
For example, Mitt Romney says on this web site: "Stop The Free-Riders.
Use some of the money currently spent on providing expensive "free
care" for the uninsured at emergency rooms to instead help the
truly needy buy private insurance."
All the candidates agree that this is one way to spend healthcare
dollars more efficiently. However, the only way to prevent the
exorbitant cost of "free care" for the uninsured from being passed
on to everyone is to either not provide medical care to anyone
without insurance or to require every American to have health
insurance. If health insurance is optional -- even if it is affordable
-- there will always be some people who will choose to spend their
money on other things, and if they have a major illness, everyone
will probably end up helping pay for their care. And yet, none
of the candidates suggest that we should let people die if they
don't have insurance, and Hillary Clinton is the only candidate
whose plan requires that all Americans will have health insurance
(in much the same way that most states require everyone who drives
to have car insurance.)
If it were easy to improve health care and lower the costs, we
would have solved the problem already. It's complicated, but all
the candidates agree that healthcare and health insurance need
to be more affordable. The 3 Republicans would leave it up to
each State to decide, but they also emphasize that companies are
the key to improving the system, not the government. The Democrats'
plans are more specific because you can learn about the Congressional
health insurance plan to give you some idea of whether that would
benefit you. (See http://www.opm.gov/insure/08/spmt/plansearch.aspx).
And under one proposal -- Hillary Clinton's -- all Americans would
have health insurance.
The National Research Center for Women & Families applauds all
the candidates' interest in making healtcare more affordable.
Of the 2 Democrats' plans, we prefer Hillary Clinton's because
it would provide healthcare for all adults and children. Of the
Republicans' plans, we are impressed with John McCain's comprehensive
approach to improving health care (as described on his web site),
but less impressed with the specifics of his plan.
Democrats
|
|
|
|
Supports
* requiring everyone to have health insurance
* everyone can choose between keeping existing insurance,
a federal plan similar to Medicare, or offering the health
plans offered to Members of Congress
* providing tax credits to small businesses that provide health
insurance
* large businesses must help employees to pay for coverage
* providing tax deductions to individuals that will make sure
the health insurance is affordable
* people can keep their health insurance even if they leave
their jobs
* states can join together to provide health insurance
* drug companies have to offer medications at fair prices
|
Supports
* requiring children under the age of 18 to
have health insurance
* creating a national health care plan available to all Americans
that is similar to the health plans offered to Members of
Congress, but does not require adults to be covered
* creating a “National Health Insurance Exchange” to require
insurance companies to provide healthcare at specified levels
and regulates costs
* employers who do not help pay for health insurance for
their employees must pay a percentage of their payroll to
help support the national health care plan
* people can keep their health insurance even if they leave
their jobs
* requiring insurance companies to allow children up to the
age of 25 to remain on their parents’ plans
* expanding Medicaid and SCHIP
* states can experiment with their own plans if they meet
minimum requirements
|
Does Not Support
* insurance companies denying care to those with preexisting conditions
* higher cost for health insurance for people with preexisting
conditions
|
Does Not Support
* insurance companies denying care to those
with preexisting conditions
|
Republicans
|
|
|
|
Supports
* "a complete overhaul of our healthcare system"
by encouraging innovation of the private sector and encouraging
states to experiment
* people are responsible for buying insurance rather than
employers responsible for providing coverage
* health insurance coverage can be moved when people change
their jobs
* individuals who buy private health insurance get tax deductions
or tax credits
* expanding availability of health savings accounts
* restrictions on medical malpractice law suits
|
Supports
* changes in Medicare and Medicaid
* encouraging states to experiment
* relying on private sector to help reduce the number of uninsured,
for example by encouraging innovation and requiring private
insurance companies to provide national coverage
* bringing costs under control using new federal policies,
promoting competition, and other policies
* reducing costs by providing tax deductions for those buying
health insurance
* expanding availability of health savings accounts
* reducing costs of medications by allowing cheaper prescription
drugs to be imported from other countries and increasing availability
of generic drugs
* public health initiatives to reduce obesity and smoking
* restrictions on medical malpractice law suits
|
Does Not Support
* requiring health insurance for all Americans
|
Does Not Support
* requiring health insurance for all Americans
|
| |
|